The missiles are the destination
By Garrett,
One of my uncommon enjoyments is the work that happens right in the middle of a big problem that needs to be solved, or even a nosedive. A calmness kicks in, the path gets clearer and I can usually tunnel vision my way through to course correction.
I used to think this was special, but it’s really not.
As it happens, this is a requirement of the job. Especially for founders and leaders, and especially for founders and leaders in the tech industry.
The missiles are the destination.
I was watching an interview recently between David Senra and Brad Jacobs, a billionaire businessman, talking about the perspective of “I’ve got too many problems to deal with” v.s. “the more problems I solve the more value I create”. That’s a summary, but you can see the original here:
“All day long, you have incoming missiles. You have great stuff too, but in between that is punches to the face. And if you’re going to get beaten up by that, you’re not going to be successful, and secondly, you’re not going to be happy.” —Brad Jacobs pic.twitter.com/IwExa8gNER
— David Senra (@davidsenra) October 28, 2025
Two owners of smaller shops recently told me similar advice to the following that they had been given:
“You just have to find the magic bullet and then X will happen.”
I’ve looked for that, on and off, for a long time and wasted a lot of money trying, but eventually came to the conclusion that it’s a million pretty good decisions over the course of a longer-than-expected period of time that mostly sprouted into plants instead of weeds.
At some point I heard or read that the gift of solving a problem is that you get a new problem to solve, which is what Brad is saying above. That’s the magic bullet (except it’s definitely not magic and it’s much slower than a bullet).
The missiles are the destination.
Like this? Get email updates or grab the RSS feed.
More insights:
-
The trust problem that you already solved
Every developer who has spent time with AI coding tools carries the same low-grade anxiety. You ask the model to build something, it hands you back a file, and then you stare at it like a customs inspector wondering whether the suitcase has a false bottom. Line by line, function…
-
The flatness of the machine
You can feel it before you can name it. A paragraph arrives, fluent and frictionless, and something in the back of your reading brain flinches. The sentences are grammatically flawless, the structure orderly, the tone warm but not too warm, authoritative but not too authoritativ…
-
Software was never meant to last forever
There is a particular kind of frustration that anyone who has worked inside a mid-sized organisation will recognise. You are eighteen months into a Salesforce implementation. The original scope was clean and reasonable. But somewhere around month four, somebody realised that you…
-
The vibe coding spectrum: from weekend hacks to the dark factory
A year ago, Andrej Karpathy posted a tweet that would come to define how an entire industry talks about itself. “There’s a new kind of coding I call ‘vibe coding,’” he wrote, “where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists.” He d…
-
Claude Opus 4.6 just shipped agent teams. But can you trust them?
Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 4.6 this week. The headline features are strong: a 1M token context window (a first for Opus models), 128K output tokens, adaptive thinking that adjusts reasoning depth to the task, and top-of-the-table benchmark scores across coding, finance, and l…
